That totally contradicts your earlier comment ITT - Hive system shines in allowing screwing someone with a DV as you only risk getting DVed by a bigger hammer, while anyone daring to upvote what you DVed (or are going to DV) is paying a financial penalty upfront (including stakeholders much larger than you).
That's also why it suits current shareholders. Remove the penalty (by giving everyone the same curation APR regardless of what they upvote) and the next time you try to screw someone with a DV you might end up pissing off the public to the point where they collectively upvote your target tenfold compared to where it was prior to your DV.
Obv, Mane is out of line rooting for a dumb integer to be replaced by a dumber boolean (even without rounding, it is dumb pretending an ability to compare every possible pair of accounts) but he is actually up to something here:
- People demand something to be displayed next to the account name.
- There is no good way to use the spot
Conclusion: Making it transparent pay-to-win beats any non-transparent effort.
:D
Sharp as a razor, that is what I was basically saying.
If we don't have a working system, I'd argue a dysfunctional system, kill it before it gets pregnant.
As far as I know, there's to be no expectation of rewards, including curation. If you're upvoting garbage, and someone removes the rewards from garbage because they don't want to be screwed over and watch money fly out the door for no reason, the one upvoting the garbage in the first place screwed themselves, they were not screwed over by someone else.
I'm sure that makes way more sense now lol
And maybe it's worth pointing out, if someone out there is being an intentional menace with their downvotes, that's still not the final say.
You have -14. All that tells me is you pissed someone off and perhaps that individual doesn't handle anger well, and that's still a guess. That -14 doesn't force me to think less of you as an individual. Much like an 80 doesn't mean you're a class act.
Those with the mark are good or qualified? Those without the mark are bad or unqualified?
That's madness, in my opinion.