The problem with graphs is they can be interpreted in any way people want to interpret them, depending on what they're most wanting to corroborate. For example, with the UK one, the vaccines may have started in December when they had a surge in covid cases and by all accounts it was spreading like wildfire. However, the deaths peak at the point where they were rolling the jabs out in a much bigger and more public way. Prior to this it was more of a testing faze and not many were vaccinated. So one could say that there weren't enough people vaccinated to stop this spread at that time, but with the big rollout the deaths decreased rapidly.
I can only speak for the UK graph in this regard as I have family there and my finger on the pulse a bit more, so to say. However, if this pattern goes for all the country graphs shown, I'd still be questioning why every single rollout coincided with an increase in covid cases.
Factor in more stats like the amount of post-vaccine deaths rising 8x in the US alone. Try pulling figures like those for all the countries in question and recalculate...
You don't need to convince me. I've been trying to convince my sister, but for everything I cam pull up, she's got something that puts it in a different perspective. I've been trying to find something indisputable; sadly, I'm too late anyway now, she's had her first jab.
You're not going to find many people who will pull up all the figures, especially if it's something they don't want to see. I don't have the time or health to do much on it myself. I really appreciate those who are putting these things together and the links are valuable. I merely pointed out the graph thing, because it's an easy thing to pull up and dispute.
The link owasco has left is some scary stuff. Did you see the Health Ranger video before the c started, pretty much warning us about the pattern we've seen from the start of the virus?