Based on what little I have seen, it appears Tate is an abusive, manipulative scumbag. His posturing and attitude of self-righteous persecution victim combined with his admitted methods of manipulating vulnerable women supports my stated impression. I don't claim to be an expert in human psychology, but I have made some modest study of human psychology as it applies to markets, politics, and abusive relationships. You're always welcome to refute anything I write with contrary facts or alternate explanations. You didn't do that. Make a case, don't build a strawman or resort to ad hominem.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Why do you think charity outweighs abuse? Isn't that the argument made by government apologists? "Sure, the police state is abusive and the military-industrial complex is corrupt, but welfare!"
And if zero women came out against him, what about the women who, y'know, came out against him?