The ongoing saga of the arrest of Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan has caused numerous independent researchers to deep dive into the topic - ultimately exposing a long string of lies that the Tates have continued to spread to try to cover their tracks.
This new video does a good job of following up on a previous video that went viral recently that also exposed their lies. In this new video, Andrew Tate's own response video is picked apart and the lies are once again exposed.
The story here is quite long and detailed, but in summary:
- The Tate brothers have openly admitted to using a method of deception and ultimately psychological manipulation, often involving threats of various kinds in order to trick women into working for them on online sexcam websites.
- Behind all the bluff and bravado, the Tates have in many videos over the years - some public and some private - admitted to many aspects of the crimes they are charged with.
- Their defence has revolved around claiming that they were only charged with deceiving women to get them to make Tik tok videos and then taking their profits. The evidence and court documents shows these claims to be false.
- The actual court documents make clear that the charges relate to human trafficking, rape and exploitation via the production of porn - often with threats of or actual violence being involved.
- The Romanian police/courts have a second ongoing investigation into other charges that are not yet public.
Andrew Tate himself admits that he uses 'the lover boy' method in order to acquire women to work in the porn industry for him. This essentially means that he lies to them, has sex with them and then tricks them into thinking that he wants a long term relationship with them.
He admits to using well established psychological manuipulation - that amounts in many ways to trauma based mind control - in order to retain them as profit making machines long term.
His strategies very clearly amount to picking women who are from broken homes and/or who are young (he openly states that he began his relationship with his main girlfriend when she was 15 years old) and programming them through fear and lies in order to control their lives and overpower their free will for profit.
Many people have wondered how and why it is that there are so many pedophiles in the modern world, abducting, raping and prostituting children globally. Perhaps part of the reason is that the huge profits involve lead many people to seek ways to exploit those who the easiest to exploit and the least likely to defend themselves. Children are clearly those who are least safe here and the 'education' on how to do this for profit, provided by the Tates' 'university' could well amount to them being behind 'educating' an entire generation of depraved pedophile 'entrepeneurs' too - whether they meant to or not.
Anyone who is supporting these characters needs to do their own due dilligence into the topic instead of blindly believing what the Tate brothers are saying. Being a massive pedo supporter is never a strong look.. whether in public or in jail.
May truth and peace prevail.
Ura-Soul
video credit: The Milk Bar TV
▶️ 3Speak
Tate definitely oozes with douchebag energy. I know women who got suckered into relationships with manipulative jerks, although not to this extent. On one hand, it's easy to say, "you should have known better," but on the other hand, this victim-blaming lets the jackass off the hook. There is a dark art to psychological manipulation.
sorry, this former comment was not directed at you, I deleted it.
EDIT noted, response rant likewise removed.
thanx.
This topic exposes many parts of life that most people deliberately ignore and many are to some extent involved in within their own lives in one way or another.. but prefer not to notice. As a result, the majority of people just 'skip over' it or come up with some reason to justify it without really making much sense.
If people really understood how prevalent mind control is and how it works, Tate would probably already be lynched.
Those you seem to be going to war against seem to be your role model though, how else is it possible to pick a public figure and join the witch hunt and see someone as "long lynched". Without waiting for the legal process? You're behaving like ancient Rome, where the sensationalist public gave the thumbs up or thumbs down.
Didn't it bother you that during the Corona period you were prejudged and called non-vaxxer, grandparent killer and who knows what else? Didn't it upset you deeply? How can you toot the same horn now that you've experienced what it's like to be one of the publicly branded?
It's in vogue right now to get upset about human trafficking as if it's something totally new. People are looking for perpetrators, i.e. people who offer an excellent target through their internet presence.
So you know about mind control and manipulation, you should be the first to know that nowadays all people who appear on the Internet with photo, video, sound and text can be put into all contexts that you like or dislike? If you know as much about it as you are proud to do, then you would realize that you are as sensationally into what is going on in the media and you are in no way different from "most people". By doing this, you are confirming this way of dealing with each other and you are confirming that the way people were dealt with in Corona time was RIGHT. You are confirming that the governments acted correctly by preaching morality. Except that you have been on the side of the morally outlawed in this regard. You therefore differ in nothing from those you call ignorant. Now, to be on the side of the morally righteous, aren't you too cheap to look for one who will make you look good? Especially since the Tate character is being picked apart by all sorts of people right now, and all you have to do is jump on that bandwagon, because it's pretty certain you're going to get winded on this.
Let me ask you this, would you like to see Tate lynched, murdered?
Since you imply that, it would only be logical for you to take that into your own hands. Have you never heard that the public branding of a person may well lead others into strange fanatical acts and they become assassins because public opinion gave them the necessary impetus to do so? Since your article and comments imply such, you would have to become an avenger on Tate. If you can't or won't, you seem to approve of others might doing it for you. At the very least, harm him as a person and thereby damage his economic and social existence (character assassination). What interest do you have in supporting this?
You do not give the benefit of the doubt, which goes against every jurisdiction that we people who call ourselves civilised have given ourselves. Where a court has already taken up the matter, it is not your business, for if it were, courts would be superfluous. Which is followed by my question, do you give a shit about jurisprudence?
No, I don't want to see him lynched. Violence is not a viable solution to anything at all.. and neither, even, is death - in the long term - a solution.
I simply highlighted the degree of pain and the related rage that most people contain as a result of being life long victims of mind control. Speaking from experience, when the deeper details of how these systems work is exposed, a great deal of frustration and rage can surface. The fact that the Tates are selling themselves as emancipators from such mind control (the matrix) while also very clearly using almost every trick in the book to program and control others around them, shows the hypocrisy but also their intent. If people fully understood the situation, as I understand it, many would be enraged. I personally have never valued Tate or been a victim of his, so I don't feel anger directly at him. I feel concern for the many victims who have been exploited by him in so many ways.
You use the words "most people" very often. Have you ever tried to get along without this formulation and to avoid any "many people"; "few people" etc.? I have noticed how difficult it is for me to get rid of this annoying habit.
Why do you feel you need to highlight anger, as if there isn't enough of it already?
To Tate and what he probably said in a great many hours and a great many videos somewhere, it will be like with all public figures: even if you know all their videos, read all their texts (if any) and listened to all their linguistic formulations, you will
a.) recognize a lot of contradictions
b.) find something coherent for you in their statements
c.) find something very inconsistent in the statements.
Just take your own internet presence. At some point, if I go through your entire blog vita, I'll find everything from a to c. If I have personally decided not to like you, I will focus my attention on your weaknesses. If I have decided to like you, I look at what identifies me with you. But to claim that I know you, would be able to analyze you and prove to you crystal clear that you are of this or that particular disposition would take away the benefit of the doubt, wouldn't it?
If I use the phrase 'most people' then I do so based on having had sufficient experience with large numbers of people to understand very well the prevailing patterns within the human condition that are relevant to the context. It is a loose phrase, applied loosely.
Highlighting anger gives people an opportunity to consider the situation whilst noticing the extent of how much emotion has been denied - it does not create more anger.
In the case of Andrew Tate, it is abundantly clear from many sources that he is a walking contradiction - but it is not random - it is that he seeks to exploit just about everyone in different ways, so he says one thing to one group of people and another to another group. You only need to watch/listen to enough of the leaked material and testimony from whistleblowers.
I am an expert in patterns and have 20+ years of experience with healing emotional injuries in self and with others. I don't proclaim to know everything and I am not offering here anything other than my own views that might trigger some people to ask questions that they had not thought to ask previously.
I don't need to know an individual intimately to know how mind control functions and to see it's use.
Your headline titles
So, you are saying that you know for sure that he is a rapist and a human trafficker without giving the benefit of a doubt. Would you testify for that in front of a court?
There is a difference between a rapist and human trafficker and someone who pleases different groups with different/contradicting each other messages. You never done that? You need not to like this person and neither buy anything from him. No matter how persuasive someone appears. If there is nothing you have personally against him then, I conclude, he stands for somebody or something you abhor. I would then suggest not to pick him as a character to assassinate but the theme/topic in which you give some different perspectives.
Whatever people use to position themselves publicly, whatever they sell, any modern person who doesn't know, for example, that advertising and PR are the means to get attention, sales, turnover and reputation, is not a victim but prefers not to know, since ever modern adult with a mobile device and internet access knows that advertising is manipulative and that anyone who earns money advertising via his Internet presence uses certain manipulation techniques - he builds an image, a brand from himself. You too, by the way, through the clickbait headline and certain themes that recur (I don't exclude myself).
I might actually take you seriously if you were, say, a lawyer and your argumentation was written in a purely legal/technical/objective way, or if you just blogged as a normal guy from your everyday life and I could witness anecdotally that you are neither the classic masculine success guy with a fast car (my house, my car, my boat), nor the yoga-driving enlightened eso guy who understands women.
I'm not really sure of your logic here since the truth doesn't need to be convincing and it can be arrived at without focusing so much on any messengers involved.
Based on what little I have seen, it appears Tate is an abusive, manipulative scumbag. His posturing and attitude of self-righteous persecution victim combined with his admitted methods of manipulating vulnerable women supports my stated impression. I don't claim to be an expert in human psychology, but I have made some modest study of human psychology as it applies to markets, politics, and abusive relationships. You're always welcome to refute anything I write with contrary facts or alternate explanations. You didn't do that. Make a case, don't build a strawman or resort to ad hominem.
Why do you think charity outweighs abuse? Isn't that the argument made by government apologists? "Sure, the police state is abusive and the military-industrial complex is corrupt, but welfare!"
And if zero women came out against him, what about the women who, y'know, came out against him?
Hilarious the alt media is not covering this at all.
Well, one thing Tate has gotten right is that the majority of people are gutless.
I got hit up by AT and he wanted me to be one of his recruits.
I said hell no.
I'm glad AT is in all sorts of trouble. He is not a good person and ran his mouth and is getting the pinch from that "corrupt" country that's now got him on charges...
Without having his entire record I can't say for sure, but he ticks several boxes for being a clinical psychopath.
He's a petty little idiot. He brags about having a five fight career.
He got really upset when I didn't know who he was or the fact that he claims to have this huge fight record...
His little idea of getting all these guys to pay him money to be top g's? Lol!
Definitely not a fan. AT looks bad after the jail time and reports we're going around that he was suffering from cancer in a weird desperate cry for sympathy for him to get released from jail. Hmmm personally I think he's a liar with a tiny weiner that would do anything to get out of jail after being screwed over by the Romanian government after he screwed them over by talking crap about them...
Don't forget he was bragging about how he could just buy off the Romanian government because it was so corrupt. So he sharpened that ax himself!
Tate deserves it.
Haha.. Well, if you offer people free money then who knows what will happen. I don't know much about the Romanian government but since most governments are partially corrupt, that was a pretty dumb move.
I keep seeing a repeating pattern - people who are his 'fans' telling me that I need to do research and watch videos about him, when I've literally watched all the videos that have come up about him for a while (only because of his arrest) and a few before that.. and yet they themselves haven't even bothered to watch a single one of the videos that I point them to which contradict all of their points. lol.
I was reminded last night when discussing how he is a habitual liar that I saw him a couple of days ago talking about a book written by a pimp that gave some 'rules of the pimp game' or something similar.. I laughed because I specifically remembered him saying in another video, quite a while ago - that I saw before he was arrested I think.. that he has never read a book at all.. and he was trying to inspire others to also never read books. lol
He couldn't be a more obvious manipulator / moron.
Actually I think you really should look into this fake dude.
Infact cowboy Donald verrone just called tate out and called him a fake fighter. Which is a serious allegation..
Tate is a kickboxer with a 5 fight win streak which most are calling a set up career with no actual fighting experience.
Infact tate is managed by this older scam artist guy as apart of his top g movement where you too can get info about what cars and cigars you need to buy to be like tate.
Yeah. Then the "wokeness" Tate is selling. Oh yeah Alex Jones made that Tshirt. The world isn't going to accept tate as an idol or a leader. Infact his top g sex trafficking movement got sabotaged by him directly saying Romania is a corrupt paradise and he paid them off and can do what he wants. So Romania jacked him up hard core.
And now even Donald cerrone is calling tate a rapist.
I'd fight tate. Even laughed at him when he got all.offended that I didn't consider Tates 5 fight career something special. Shit I've got 2 cage fights and thousands of actual real scuffles. Besides my 10 vs me home invasion.
Tate is fake as fuck everything and deserves to get took by those smarter than him. Which is happening.
Those rape and human trafficking allegations are going to stick. And then he isn't ever going to be respected by any man in the world. So I really hope tate catches those convictions.
Fuck Tate... Hahahahaha!
That dude is a dumb ass, even pre the arrests, watch a single video and it just reeks of wanker!
Hivefest Mexico
???How are you @ura-soul
Not excusing what he did or does, but I don't think it should be equated with child trafficking either.
Tate is a grifter, and that should be pretty obvious to people.
Unfortunately, there's a lot of guys who think he's this cultural icon.
His "PHD" course though, is just him grifting guys out of their money.
He could easily be lying about most of it.
No offense, but women becoming cam whores for their rich boyfriend doesn't make a ton a sense. Is he manipulating women? Yes, but I don't know if that equates to trafficking.
From what I understand they chose to do everything, and were never held against their will.
Also, it's very important to realize that Tate became as famous as he is today BECAUSE of the charges against him. It was an instant doubling/tripling of his fame.
Before that, I knew who he was but no one else seemed to. I asked someone if they heard about Tate getting arrested and they said "Who?" A week later they're like "Have you heard about Andrew Tate?"
One more thing. One of the women who went to meet Tate in Romania, and dated him for a while was Jordan Peterson's daughter. She left her husband and went to Romania.
Pretty sure she has said Tate helped get her father into that experimental Russian facility to get him off of his benzodiazapine addictions.
Why doesn't that ever get mentioned?
What is the source for your information here?
As the video points out, most people's view of Tate's situation comes from Tate and not from the court documents or the police. As the video highlights, the court documents tell a very different story to what Tate has been stating and they also have a second case being built concurrently with other charges, including apparently trafficking of a minor. He himself states in the video that he started his relationship with his long term girlfriend when she was 15.
The point I made in the above post about children is primarily that the absolutely evil scumbags who rape and prostitute children are getting their techniques from 'somewhere'. For them Tate's 'strategies' for 'pimping' are a gold mine.
I don't think that's true. From what I've seen he cannot achieve anything without deceiving women and programming them into becoming robots for his plan. He openly states that he looks for the dumbest but beautiful women who are from broken homes to then 'train' and basically program into what most people would call 'sex slaves' but what he has conveniently rebranded as 'sex workers'. He also lies habitually and this is easily exposed if you read through the many leaked recordings and text messages from his group.
One thing he lies about is how much money the women get and why they stay with him. He will claim they do the work because he made them 'rich' and because they love him. In reality, he has stated himself in other places that he might pay then £2000 a month and keep £500,000 from that month for himself. You really think he has hundreds of millions of pounds and the women do too, yet they continue to risk their safety every day by digitally prostituting themselves out and at the very least attracting stalkers etc.?
There is an abundance of evidence that he is lying about the majority of the details of his relationship with these women. That is the point of this video and others like it. Again, I'm not sure you have watched it.
Tate is illuminati. He's also been bothering whistleblower #DonaldMarshall at cloning.
..
Yeah those twitter posts are def proof he is illuminati
lol
Then you wanna frame him as a guy who would fuck a tranny.
You aint got nothing better to discredit him?
.
Andrew Tate admits that he would bang a tranny:
Tell me you didn't watch the video without telling me.. 😫