You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Deep Dives 19 | Confirmed Conspiracy Theories | 200 HIVE in Prizes

in Deep Dives4 years ago

Lol, yes you can't answer that question because you know it a ABSOLUTE LIE and in these times you should be ashamed of yourself.

No you need to proof to us that your unicorn exists with checkable facts.

Like "we" can prove to "you" that many governments are corrupt and up to evil plans.

Enjoy your unicorn. 🤠

Sort:  

Its real. They live in my closet. They are invisible so you cant see or hear them because they live on another plane of existence.
Only if youre in tune with "the truth" can you see the unicorns. Dont be a sheep.

Ever heard of building 7? It fell down like a demolition crew set charges but there was no evidence of explosives at the site. Only a unicorn from another plane of existance would have the power to take down WTC 7. My friend that is an exobiologist can confirm the possibility of extraterrestrial unicorns that are relatives of the anunnaki and the lizard people that want to establish the new world order.
If you look at the Zecharia Sitchin translation of ancient Sumerian texts, that he hid and only shared with the privileged few of us, it is the Unicorns that will save the human race from Bill Gates and his evil vaccination chips and Hillary and her child sacrificial kabal.

Unicorns will set you free. Dont be a sheep. Dont let HARP and chemtrails brainwash you.
Only if you free your mind and accept the Unicorn king as your lord an savior will you survive!

there was no evidence of explosives at the site.

That is factually incorrect. There were samples taken of the remnant material that revealed thermic materiel was present.

You undertake a logical fallacy regarding your unicorns, and seem to not understand the scientific method. Remember Carl Sagan's aphorism, that extraordinary claims, such as unicorns in the closet, require extraordinary evidence.

The scientific method depends on evidence that is revealed by tests of a theory. You go to pains to make your unicorns untestable, and this exemplifies your rejection of the actual evidence presented regarding 9/11.

When you claim peer reviewed evidence of thermate in the residue of 9/11 does not exist, you expose your zeolotry and faith in your overlords. You want to believe, so you ignore evidence.

You obey.

Let me know when you actually consider factual evidence. Until then you're just trolling.

The thermite bit is one of the most absurd claims. I will not attempt to debunk any nonsensical idea you have. They have already been debunked numerous times as was the thermite one. There was no thermite.
All you have to do is research it a bit.
By responding to unfounded claims i give them legitimacy and anything that can be asserted without evidence should be dismissed.

I dont have time for it. Im sorry but i need to feed my unicorn.

Feeding unicorns is what you do.

Debunking is not just making a claim. Prove it's wrong to debunk, and that has not happened. You ignore what you desperately want to not know, and the University of Fairbanks has a peer reviewed study regarding Building Seven that is exactly what you must not know.

Good luck. Without reason and knowledge, luck is all you have.

A flawed research based on a photograph of one side of the building funded by conspiracy theorists. Give me a break. lol

The funny thing in all this is your belief that this proves something. Some conspiracy. That leap in logic that if it didnt fall due to fire that would somehow prove a conspiracy of the government tearing down its buildings.
Absurd.

9/11 was a conspiracy. You may disparage peer reviewed research published by an accredited American university after four years of study, but you do not recommend your opinion by doing so.

You also neglect the fact of history, in which agents of government have many, many times committed false flags for various reasons.

Where do you think the phrase 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned' comes from? It's how Nero became Emperor. He owned a private fire company, which set fire to the estates of the wealthy and would only put the fires out for payment. The sinking of the Maine that began the Spanish American war was a false flag. The Gulf of Tonkin incident that began US involvement in Vietnam was a false flag. Roosevelt was specifically aware of the Pearl Harbor attack because the US could read the encrypted messages of Japan.

Which conspiracy accurately details the 9/11 terrorist attack is undetermined, and much of the information that would have been useful to correctly understand who did what was illegally and deliberately destroyed by the USG, who had the evidence carted off as scrap metal, rather than allowing the NTSB or any law enforcement to examine the crime scene per long established law and precedent.

That, by itself, is actual evidence of a crime committed by the USG regarding 9/11, if only of obstruction of justice.

Do what you want. Being right isn't a given. You'll have to account relevant details to discard falsehoods, and you seem not only to not have done that, but to be desperately dedicated to not doing so regarding 9/11.

Because "A" happened that proves that "B" happened.
You dont see how that makes 0 sense.
No, "B" happened only if theres evidence for "B" happening.

I actually looked at the Hulsey report and its seriously flawed. He uses a static analysis for a dynamic situation. You can do that for a single column but thats it. His models disregard affects of fire on the beems and the fact the fire burned for 7 hours. He manually removes columns. His models have wrong metrics.

Basically this research is absolute rubbish. Something a student could have done better. It wouldnt get a passing grade on any serious college.

And the thermite nonsense. Not a single thing points in that direction.
And the metal spheres they talk about... If you want i can show you how you can make them at home with a pack of matches and some iron filings.

Prove it, this is 2020, you can copy and paste check-able facts.

Otherwise stop talking shit please. 🤠

"You can't prove me wrong" is the hallmark of an unfalsifiable hypothesis (naked appeal to ignorance).

Dont be a sheep! Dont buy into the CIA narrative! They only want you to think that this isnt true!
Look at building 7! There was no proof of explosives so how could the building fall down like that!
Extraterrestrial unicorns is how! Thats why you cant take the Bill Gates poison vaccine! You will never be able to see the unicorns! You will never be able to communicate with them or save yourself.
DMT right now is the only way to come in contact with them because they poison you with chemtrails so you cant and the new world order wants to to ban it! Why? Because the government wants to keep your prisoner! DMT can be found in the human brain. How can it be bad!

Dont let them fool you. Free your mind!

In other words... Everything you people say is bollocks.

I'm serious, are you on any prescription drugs?

Rush to disqualify (ad hominem attack).