There is no premine funds so i am not very concerned about that, no majority share holder could get enough HP to out vote the Witnesses, imo.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
There is no premine funds so i am not very concerned about that, no majority share holder could get enough HP to out vote the Witnesses, imo.
Well, if Just in Sun was really clever, they could have just paid-off (hired) the top 20 Witnesses.
Any multi-million dollar corporation worth their salt could figure that one out.
lol you clearly havent bribed someone before because thats so risky I dont know a logical person who would suggest that.
Offering them jobs seems pretty fool-proof.
Lol because they wouldn't pass the first audit of this blockchain if it was a legal company... I don't see it.
They could be hired as "consultants" in order to skirt any potential legal complications.
What would be owner of that consultancy firm have to gain from hive?
20,000 users at the cost of 20 + salaries?
My original hypothesis was that a state actor like China might want to suppress free-speech (any speech that criticized China and or the idea of "communism").
Corporations have spent enormous amounts of money in order to "protect" their "reputation" from "journalists".
It doesn't seem difficult to imagine someone might not like all the "qanon" and "informationwar" posting.