i agree with both @wiseagent and @friendlymoose points about the rewards being spread out more and higher rewards being given to people who make a lot of effort. But, when I read your post, I couldn't really think of any solution to the points you made.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I've suggested in one of the comments to assemble a think tank to discuss some of the ideas that were mentioned in the blog and the comments.
Do you know who it is who actually makes these types of decisions. Is it just the top 20 witnesses?
It depends what decision you mean. We can all decrease the value of a post with a downvote. But downvotes are not very commonly used for this. But they can...
No. I meant the bigger decisions like how votes are paid out. The split, the dust amount etc. etc.
I don't know that either.
I also suggested to configure a maximum reward for posts. I think would need to be changed in the blockchain. I don't know who decides these kind of changes.
Maybe @acidyo knows.