The team made a response: https://inleo.io/@leofinance/opening-the-kimono-of-onboarding-data-time-for-full-transparency-7jc
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The team made a response: https://inleo.io/@leofinance/opening-the-kimono-of-onboarding-data-time-for-full-transparency-7jc
I’ll have a look later. I have zero trust since inleo started censoring, but they might actually be transparent for once.
Did they mute you from the community? This is the first time I'm hearing about such actions. I have seen accounts get censored for abuse. I haven't seen it happen for disagreements.
Feel free to read the entire conversation on Inleo. There's like 15 comments in total. Or do so on any other front end.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/godfish/re-leothreads-eagmgv9p?referral=godfish
I will take a look.
But at the very first glance, the funds from the previous proposal should be returned as promised in it - the deliverable was not really delivered
Am I mistaken?
The industry standard is that MAU = Content Creators + Content Consumers. Under this definition (which is how every Web 2 social media and every DAPP measure their users) INLEO reached the target. You are using a personal definition of yours to measure activity. Under your definition, No social media on the planet would have even 500 million MAUs.
No. I am using the definition from the previous proposal.