Measuring the financial value of a post is a complicated thing (in fact, everything that involves money is), and it ends up having a very personal weight.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Measuring the financial value of a post is a complicated thing (in fact, everything that involves money is), and it ends up having a very personal weight.
Considering the ecosystem as a whole (as an extension that connects people) and all the whales, orcas and double dolphins that are part of it, I don't think the value of this post is high (because it has a relevant and well-written subject).
Not only does it have an interesting theme, it also generates an interest in multiple responses in a broad way that goes hand in hand in the balance of interaction vs.reward...
1/3
I have seen this post the first minutes after it was published, then hours later reading the comments and so on... I noticed that the reward was rising as more interactions, contrary to what I see with other whales...
2/3
first comes the reward in a matter of seconds and minutes (by autovotes) and then comes the interaction that could well be for a debatable and interesting topic, or simply because it is in the trends (by the high autovote, which of course generates advantages to the interaction).
I think Snaps needs a premium paid system to increase the limit of characters to write xD
Speaking of which... What I really miss is seeing more relevant posts receiving the same kind of rewards (or at least something more substantial).
Projects with higher voting weight should look more broadly at other users. Curation work isn't easy, but could be (even) better.