A lot of defi protocols have an interesting way to distribute the funds according to the votes. I think downvoting would not even be necessary. We have all a vote regarding how the DHF is distributed and this vote depends on our stake. Now imagine that we have a 100% vote and then we can distribute it the way we want. 25% for project 1, 50% for project two and 25% for return proposal. Like that it would be much fairer because even whales couldn't vote for all proposals with their full vote. I agree that rewarding the voting activity would be quite good. A proposal of the DHF could simply distribute a part of its distribution to the people who drop their votes maybe also in relation with their voting power. This would be another incentive for holding hive power and in my opinion the whole voting process would be fairer.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That's a really great idea. This would certainly make things fairer.
That's an interesting idea with percentages... But if I disagree with the proposal and I still want to get incentives, without the downvote, I would still have to vote "for" the proposal... true, maybe with a 0.001%, but it is a vote... 😃