You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is Voter Apathy Our Main DHF Problem? .:. WorkerBee PH-Pool Week 211

in Ecency6 hours ago


Maybe I could add this: We should vote several times in favor of the proposal. At least once more, halfway through the proposal. The proposers of the proposal should also, at least halfway through the project, report back on what is happening.
If voters had a reason (if they get a prize), at least at the end of the project, they would certainly be more active because it is in their interest to do so.
And for the witnesses, I would put the vote every six months. We need to speed things up or get the members more active.Thanks for the news. This is a good idea you have here, and I support it. I agree with @achim03, too.

Sort:  

And for the witnesses, I would put the vote every six months. We need to speed things up or get the members more active.

Currently, if you don't change votes, your vote will expire in 6 months... So, that's already implemented...

What you said for proposals is similar to that... The vote could expire in 3 months, and then the voter should "reconsider" to vote again or not...

All this, without the incentives, would be impossible to do as it requires even more time than now... But, I like the idea... :)