While working in the garden yesterday, I started (but only got about halfway through) another book on the list which was popular a decade or so ago - The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fuck, by Mark Manson. I chose this one because I wanted something lighter and bit more conversational for the day, but still offered insight and points of interest to reflect upon. While I won't go into any detail about the book itself, it is basically about the benefits of "not giving a fuck" - which is completely different than being indifferent to everything. It is actually more about giving a fuck about things that matter, and letting go of the things that don't.
Again, a recommended read or listen.
Once Smallsteps came home from school and joined me, I stopped listening and spent the time talking with her while we worked together instead. But one of the things that I had been reflecting upon was the idea of "problems" and what we are willing to suffer in order to get what we want. this is something I have thought a lot about in the past myself, but it was a timely reminder for me to dive back in and build more clarity around the subject.
The thing that resonated with me from the book though was that often we are looking at problems from the wrong perspective, as we are looking to solve our problems as if it is possible to have no problems, rather than recognise that we are just exchanging one set for another. The example given was of Warren Buffet and a homeless person who both have money problems, it is just that one has a better set of them than the other.
As I have posited numerous times in the past, problems are what help us evolve as a species, because we find solutions, then get more problems, and are forced to find solutions again. This makes us smarter. However, if we are only solving the same problem over and over, then we have no need to evolve very far - which is what we have largely been doing over the last few decades, because we aren't learning from our past history enough.
But, since attention is the most valuable resource we possess, if we are spending our attention on solving problems that don't need to be solved, or have little value to solve, then we don't have the availability to solve the things that actually matter. There are many, many examples of this happening in our world today, aren't there? And a lot of the solutions that people are finding for real problems are not solutions at all, but substitutes fooling the mind and body into thinking the issue is fixed, but they persist. Like loneliness and lack of intimacy, being solved by porn and cam models. Or a lack of feeling relevant being solved by ever-finely sliced identity labelling.
This is all attention energy being spent in ways that don't actually offer a solution, but do offer the impression of a solution, or the chance to avoid the actual problem, putting off having to actually find a solution at all. And while we all have problems, there seems to be a "wealth gap" in terms of the value of where we are investing our attentional resources, with some putting their energy into solving for what makes their lives better, but most putting theirs into finding ways to avoid solving anything at all.
I give too much of a fuck about too many things, so what I have to do is reduce the amount of fucks I give, and focus fucking with things that lead to solutions to problems that bring value to my life and the things that I give a fuck about. These things are personal of course, and no one need feel the same about them, but I think we should all be honest with ourselves about why we care about one topic over another to check if we are just justifying spending our attention there, so we can avoid thinking about things that actually affect us, or hold us back. Is supporting a social movement a true passion, or the avoidance of dealing with personal trauma? Are the hours in front of a screen consuming relaxing, or is it the avoidance of finding something truly meaningful and rewarding to do?
Are we tired because we have been adding too much value, or not enough?
As always when I write, I write for myself and my audience, but I don't give a fuck what people think about my thoughts. They are my thoughts, and I don't care if they seem useless or some great thinker has said the same things in the past, I create what I create, and I think what I think. Yes, I listen to some books occasionally, but what I often find is a lot of thoughts I have had coming up in them too, so it doesn't matter if it was said by another, my thoughts are still mine, as are my reflections and application after.
What I do value is the interaction and feedback on the thoughts and especially where people spend time reflecting on them with their own experiences in life. What I find is that the people who criticise are not actually critical thinkers, they are fearful - because they don't actually have much thought for themselves, so rely on the quotes of others to support them. Nothing wrong with learning from others and quoting, but I also wonder, is the learning to improve, or to avoid dealing with the things that actually matter in their lives.
I suspect the latter.
But who gives a fuck.
Taraz
[ Gen1: Hive ]
A wise man once said, "sometimes you've just got to say, what the fuck."
Well, ok it wasn't a wise man, just a line from the Tom Cruise movie, Risky Business.
It has been a very long time since I have seen that movie!!
Yeah, me too. Just reminded me of it.
My art was called childish a few times. But I don't think that I will change that. I enjoy making art. Be it more complex pieces on wood or canvas like these:
or perhaps a more simplistic digital art:
Right now I am taking a short break from posting/ making art. But the more I think about this the less likely I am to change what I do. Perhaps I will try making more complex pieces again. Or perhaps I will continue making those simpler pieces and accept that they will likely earn less. I guess it doesn't matter either way as long as making art gives me joy.
What is behind your art - what message are you looking to express from yourself to the world (even if no one sees it)?
hope and inspiration. That people can still create and not just destroy. That world is an interesting place. That it is important to enjoy life.
Hoping that your artistic fire does not die out my friend.
Sometimes we have to do things for ourselves; even more so when it comes to our art.
Thank you. I don't believe that will ever happen until I will die.
Very good.
Remember, we artists never work. Everything that we do in art is play.
It is hard to let go and stop giving a fuck about trivial things sometimes. I find that as I’ve grown older though it has become easier. It is actually liberating in a sense.
Maybe it is a part of the experience wheel, where not giving a fuck only becomes available once it has spun enough.
How has the journey been so far?
What is it about the trivial things that get to you?
Oh they don’t get to me much at all anymore. I’m not sure why I let them get to me in the first place.
thats the spirit man!
I've watched Mark Manson on his YouTube channel and found his philosophy quite simple to understand. Basic stoicism really and a useful way to look at the problems of life.
Creating art in whatever form is primarily a personal experience and if we publish it. It is possible to find an audience. Not for financial gain but to share ideas.
The attention economy has corrupted this core concept and reduced 'art' to a transactional experience. Not solving any problems but deflecting the public's attention and making it harder to understand what the real problem is.
I think Mark Manson has capitalized on this and made a career from offering his assessment of the current state of affairs.
In the end 'we' have to take the steps to solve these problems. 👍
Yes. Nothing "new" and a lot of old - but maybe something worth remembering for the old, or learning for the young.
For sure. And it has led to everything being transactional - including relationships. If there is not an immediate gain, then the relationship is disposed of.
And I think this is his message in the book. We are responsible for ourselves, even if we didn't cause our problems.
This is kind of what I was talking about a while ago with the people I know who have gotten weight loss surgery. If you are just solving the situation, but not fixing the actual problem you are just going to end up in the same place. I have a book I am reading right now that I think you might like. It is going to take me awhile to get through it, but when I do I will write a post about it and tag you.
For sure. You can always drop the name and I can find it and listen. Unfortunately, I can't "read" anymore, but listening is okay :)
"Let Them" Mel Robbins
My wife just mentioned this to me yesterday and I added it to my bookshelf today! :D
It is now moving up the list in the order
I better hurry up then before you beat me to posting about it!
A good time to talk to your daughter, in the fresh air. It's cute when she brought a cup of water. I also talked to my son today when I was getting him ready for school. We discussed a big discovery, life was discovered today on a planet 120 light years away from us.
Well, not discovered perhaps - but is a possibility! :)
Saw a truck this morning with a sign in the front window made from a numberplate saying "DILLIGAF". It looked like it might be the driver's callsign of something.
Then I realised it stood for "Do I Look Like I Give A F**k ?" 😆
I wonder if it is true of the driver? :D
If we get rid of stupid things around us, which wear our energy away, we will spend it to make our life better.
Many of us would be in an empty room :D
Is the dog in the photo yours? Or does it symbolize your current appearance?😲Dear @tarazkp !
The dog in the picture looks like it's going to bite someone!😨
No - it was a stray dog that came to say hi to me in Serbia as I was walking around.
😂
I feel like that's pretty much how you have to go about things in general when you're making stuff. Back when I used to read/research about the writing/creative processes there was a lot of knowing and catering for your audience but in my opinion catering for mass appeal just makes everything incredibly mind numbingly boring.
But I'm probably not most people's target audience XD
I got a lot better at identifying the worthy problems. Mainly due to lack of energy to put up with the BS of other problems, mainly other people's problems that are just not mine to solve. I'm getting better at saying "no" as well, even though helping other has always been very important to me (as a child, I always felt powerless facing my family's numerous illnesses).
That doesn't mean that I don't consider others. Especially the ones I like are always present in my decision making - but I don't make the decisions for them, but for Lily and myself. I only take them into account and if our interests align, well, that's awesome.
I absolutely see the distraction part. Not wanting to deal with a real problem, and hence wasting time and energy on something tangent.
Thank you as always for your post, keeps me thinking :-)
Your text invites me to reflect on several profound aspects related to the nature of problems, the value of subjective thinking and the relationship between what we consider relevant and what really matters.
𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱 “𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀” 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗲𝘀: 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲'𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀. 𝗜𝗳 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁, 𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 “𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺” 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲, 𝗮 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲. 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗯𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀. 𝗜 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗮𝗿𝗴𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 𝗼𝗳 “𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀” 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘄𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗲 𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗹 𝘂𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱.
𝗧𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗼𝗿 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲. 𝗘𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗳𝗶𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗺𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺, 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝗲 𝗮 𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀. 𝗔𝗰𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗿𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘀 (𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗮𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗵𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗼𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝘀) 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲. 𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁𝘆 𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵𝘀; 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗯𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘃𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗯𝗿𝘂𝘀𝗵𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀.
𝗤𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗽𝗵𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗮𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀, 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁. 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗮 𝗽𝗼𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗽𝗵𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆. 𝗥𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲. 𝗦𝗮𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 ‘𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲’ 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗱𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀. 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗹𝘆. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿.
𝗜𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗱, 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝘄𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗵𝗮𝗽𝘀, 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝗲𝗲𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀, 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗹𝘆 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲, 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗿 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿𝘀.
I don't agree with this, as I think it assumes that a person is incapable of understanding terminology. Calling something something different, doesn't necessarily mean it has been reframed, it might just be relabelled. This is what a lot of the identity conversation is about - relabelling the world, as if it is something different than the reality it was when it was called something else.
Human experience is all subjective, isn't it? There is no objective truth in experience, even if an objective truth is known academically. When it comes to "someone has said it before" is the same as when different groups invested wheels at different times globally, without interaction. It doesn't matter who is first, but we live in a world where being first seems to matter to many people.
I wrote a post a long time ago about Shakespeare and how there is more wisdom in the satire written, than in most of the academic textbooks today.
Superb.