I thought this post of his was an attempt to quell the drama, not to escalate it.
Not so sure as of yet. I don't think the first post of these was necessary - and I think this one is less so.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I thought this post of his was an attempt to quell the drama, not to escalate it.
Not so sure as of yet. I don't think the first post of these was necessary - and I think this one is less so.
Interesting that you and I disagree on the tone we each heard him use. I thought it sounded like a genuine and fair attempt to discuss manners on the Hive blockchain. Having brought some related wrath down on my own head for trying to discuss that same thing, I am very sensitive to the vengefulness of the comments he received, and can 100% understand his wanting to clear the air.
The first one was extremely important - how else are we going to talk about the "values" we have here? I find it most curious that trying to have an open discussion about an apparently sensitive topic is so ill conceived by many. I was always of the opinion that shining light onto the dark spots is generally a rewarding experience. At least I learned a lot.
As I said in my other comment - this conversation is very very old.... It is not a dark spot you are shining a light on, and if you were paying any attention since you joined in 2017, you would know that.