my entire point is that people who aren't active with their land are also not going to be active in voting, pointing out in agreement with what I already stated was the inherent problem with this as a refutation of my stance is puzzling
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
so you feel that people who are not active with their land should continue getting paid when the only reason that they were getting paidf in the first place was because of land delays? Land delays are no longer. land is moving forward. Either participate or miss out.