thank you. I guess i'd range the priorities like this:
color > composition > objects itself (for the landscape shots).
I dont have 28mm lens, this time I borrowed 3 lens with me:
16mm fish eye (great great splendid manual lens - super fun to play with it creating 'artsy' visuals and compositions, but I didnt use it this time) , Canon 16-35mm 2.8L (expensive one! L series) and 150mm macro. So most of the wide panorams especially close-ups to the object, are done with 16-35. the macro close-ups and distant panoramas is my 150mm to blame, it is heavy and would suit tripor mor ethan my hands, but I like it.
thanks for the compliment! not sure if I still have any pizza but lets check the !BEER fridge.
ps. "colors are very thick". - do you mean, thick = good? or what?.. I tend to improve colors in photoshop, yeah. not necessarily try to get 100% same to what it was at the spot, just try to make it look cool and delicate.. or intense. camera does it mechanically most of the time - and not in the best way. (check two 1st pics - edited and as seen by the camera - imo it says it all about my editing intentions).