Excellent content friends. There are 2 things that worry me about this measure and that is that it leads to more aggressive forms of monetization by the company. The second is that the measure of completely replacing the CP by staked sps seems very drastic to me. The CP is what justifies a good part of the value of the cards as assets, now with this decision the price of the cards will simply be devalued.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
From my understanding the SPS replacing CP doesn't benefit the Splinterlands company, it is a measure to create usecase for SPS with the hope of it impacting the price of SPS token which I think is a move that can have a positive price impact on the token but the approach is too drastic for the majority of the players to afford financially.
Cards still stand a chance to remain valuable, especially with Land where cards are needed for staking, we might end up needing more cards, especially for those that have lands and want to play the game competitively.
Overall I hope the SPS staking requirement is revisited to reasonably accommodate the player base.
We appreciate your input, many thanks for watching.
It probably make sense for people with probably 400k to 500k, massive money through rentals and all that.
CP is not totally being replaced, I think you'd still need it to scale up the ranks. But then, you'll now need the SPS to now gain maximum reward. The amount you need is just so crazy. I think what we talked about in the video could have been better. I think going forward, people might no longer value card ownership again.