I chose a random sample. In scientific studies we always do that. The assumption is a randomly chosen sample should represent the population! This is fundamental of statistics.
Here, I have chosen another random sample and made a plot.
Do you see any difference? I don't. I can look at a bigger sample, I can look at half of the population and I can look at the entire population. I will find the same answer.
~57% of the accounts hold less than 1 hive or 20 Leo worth of assets
It matters not if all the Leo users cumulatively hold 10M hive or 20M hive. The above hypothesis is solid so far. Even if that number is half that, say 28%, that is still dismal!
I see no difference in the numbers you present.
I looked at your previous sample and all I could find was one 2024 with over 6k hp, 18 from 2024-2025 that are under 400hp and the rest of the 2024-2025 haven't earned or claimed. This is all that have been on-boarded to HIVE. 34 of the big accounts are from before 2022. I hope when you break down the numbers @khaleelkazi you at least break it down by year so we know how many new have put in.
57% of 125 of your chosen sample haha 💀
Why choose a random sample when we have an open source blockchain with the data?
That is an accepted scientific method.
When I have the time I can look at a bigger sample. This is my blog. I decide what I do here.
Who are you to ask me and direct me what to do?
You’re misrepresenting data by choosing a sample set that fits your narrative
It’s irrelevant now because we’ve already pulled the data and put it in a dashboard. As shown in my previous screenshots. LEO monthly active users have over 16M Hive power
Your numbers are like walking into a hospital and polling the people in it for general health statistics on a broad population
And you are vote begging, and you don't even know how to do it.
get the fuck lost