I've learned over the years that Marky is usually pretty spot on with his assessments, even though people give him a bad rap. I don't think it is even 20% deserved. What you proved here is actually one of a couple reasons why I won't be supporting their proposal.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Marky is usually never wrong with data.
I glad that you are not, because it just simply ain't right!
He cherry picked 125 random accounts. This is not a representation of LEO Holders.