This is amazing! Thank you for breaking it down like this for those of us that don't even know where to find this info. Also, I love geology :D
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This is amazing! Thank you for breaking it down like this for those of us that don't even know where to find this info. Also, I love geology :D
It’s okay not to know, I don’t know everything. I only know a few things :)
I do use the chain every day and I know it doesn't feel like thousands of new users are pouring in. Thanks!
It doesn't.
Also I mentioned in the post. To me, new users do not matter that much. Anyone can open a free account that doesn't mean anything.
Unless that account invests and hold hive or other tokens and actively contribute to the blockchain, it adds no value.
Again the must show either investment, or positive contribution by creating engaging content that people like to consume and interact as a human.
This is a clear strong statement. I read a lot of content on Hive, the range of quality is wide. There's a subjective component to "quality", but some authors and commentors certainly stand out.
The value of your statement, is that it clearly articulates your success criteria for new users. Rereading this, if I was pitching a proposal to you I would lay out a plan to onboard high quality users (by your criteria) or the methods I would use to improve the quality of their content and engagements.
Aligning goals is not impossible, but identifying the expectations of the stakeholders that we seek support from is a critical part of that process.
Yes, my message has always been very clear.
Posting for money never been a good option for us. We have 8+ years of experience on this. No other blockchain community have that. The moment you dangle money, you end up with spam.
He cherry picked 125 random accounts. This is not a representation of LEO Holders.