For me it is more how it is being spent and what we are getting in return, there is a vast difference.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
For me it is more how it is being spent and what we are getting in return, there is a vast difference.
At that point you're arguing individual proposals. Obviously there is disagreement on the merits of different proposals. As I stated, I don't agree with all of them myself, and of course many disagree with ones I'm voting for as well.
No doubt you and I disagree on the merits of many of them. But probably the bigger disagreement between us is the impact of such spending. Generally i don't think that "most" of the proposals I disagree with are causing much actual damage to price, for example, even if they aren't the best expenditures to makes. There's only one I can think of that's large enough it may have real impact.
It's not the spending it's the sell pressure, most of which with no real benefit to Hive or gaining users/investors. Just as I have no illusion that burn posts actually does anything for price, but the reduced sell pressure may.
Spending/sell pressure, two ways to look at same thing. Again, I disagree with the thesis that sell pressure from DHF is affecting price much, especially not when viewed against the positives to price (a chain with active development).