Thanks for sharing your thoughts, ganjafarmer! I knew I'd find value in tagging you wonderful people here. 😊
The earning plans will be a separate matter - curation rewards are second priority here, but yes, 100% votes would be reserved for quality comments and posts. That's exactly the plan!
I did consider the prospect of poorly written comments (which can be a subjective matter). I'd give those a minimum 1% vote in keeping with the concept.
Thanks also for suggesting the idea of abuse / spam. I can make a rule against spamming the same empty comment over and over, specifically in regards to receiving votes. Over time, I can also make a smaller voting account for the lower-quality comments/posts. That way, I can still keep the integrity of my promise while not compromising quality.
We can certainly make this work!
Actually I really like the attention to detail you are committing to this and absolutely using 1% vote can be employed. Excellent thought.
And actually curation rewards are really important. For you as well as good people that engage with the community. The more that you are rewarding those people more that we see large changes happen for both parties.
Actually that's a great point. By its own virtue, curation is meant to engage quality content.
I was specifically referring to the curation rewards that the FC community account would earn as a result of curation. I'm letting that take a backseat as a primary form of earning for the account, as I have other plans in mind! 😊 Post about that will be coming soon too.
I'll certainly tag you for that as well. Thanks for helping me build this community in a smart way.
You are very welcome and I'm excited to see all of the amazing things that you have planned. It's awesome to help others.
Wow, you have great idea here, in that case, it will be achievable. Keeping to promise is wonderful.
Thank you! 😊 Glad to hear that this set-up has a better chance of succeeding.
I'll implement the ideas together once I run them all by the community.
Thank you