here I can admit that I took a cue (being a typical recipe) but I absolutely did not copy from this article and it can be seen from the anti-plagiarism, I confirm that I was wrong in not mentioning the source, but I absolutely did not copy the text but I interpreted it my way.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Repeating misleading information is not going to help this case.
The writing is definitely directly copied from the article (or some other website with a similar article as there are more sources).
In most parts, word to word, with some slight re-writing in other parts.
As I explained before. Just before some useless plagiarism detection tool was not able to detect the theft of writing (plagiarism), it does not mean that your plagiarism has a pass and is not fraudulent.
The Post:
The Source:
Well but it's the history of this dish, it's normal that this has been reported in several sources and written in a different way, I didn't think this involved plagiarism, anyway I'm tired of this situation, if you want me to step aside there's no problem, you are in charge and it's only fair that I adapt to your rules.
I just give you one piece of advice be clearer with the rules only then the community will grow, and Hive will be more adopted.
Yes most probably I could cite various sources but I have always known the history of this dish since childhood
MEANING PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism is when you present another person's work as your own. It is
an act of forgery, it is an offence. Failure to cite your sources, whether taken from the Internet, paper documents or other sources, is considered plagiarism.
In your documentary research, it is possible to use and benefit from an author's ideas, provided that provided you do not intend to conceal the authorship of an idea, comment or work from the reader.