The points that justify for you the quality of a content are very clear and relevant to the platform.
I really appreciate that, and I see that it is a technical form that is valid to be based on when evaluating content. I'm still new to the community, so my way of analyzing is simpler and more straightforward. Although, after a while, I intend to adopt rules that are as clear as yours when it comes to voting.
I, in particular, believe that good content should have personality, be consistent with the proposed topic for discussion, and that the publication not be unnecessarily extensive, because unless it is something that piques my interest, I will not read until the end.