YOu make some great points here. This stands out for me
The misleading view that within such a majority no deviating models of life are tolerated leads to the radical view that one must fight what has offered stability.
And I ask, what is the big deal if someone feels alienated? That's life. Just like having been born a boy and wishing he had been born a girl. This person, we are told, must be made to feel normal and healthy, but requires life long and drastic medicalization to achieve that. Surreal contradiction is being foisted on us as the norm.
Any and everything that can create dependence are being desperately induced by those that parasitize collective production, because that parasitism is their only potential source of that wealth and power. The laws of physics can't be tricked, can't be turned into something else, and parasitic losses are insuperable when they can be avoided. This economic reality is a hard end for obligate parasites.
Merit will create wealth, and nothing else will. Because decentralized means of production that eliminate parasitic losses increase productivity, them with merit will adopt them to increase their wealth. This infantilism is inflicted in order to prevent that transcendence of centralization, to create dependence on overlords, the masters that feed their slaves, because that is the only mechanism that can prevent merit from having it's effect and increasing sovereignty and prosperity. But I don't think this has even remotely the potential to prevent a nominally substantial population from meriting their wealth by making it. It's not even mathematically potential that non-productive dependents can sustain the wealth of them dependent on parasitizing collective production, because those obligate dependents aren't productive at all.
Only merit is the way forward.
Right, it's no big deal. Something every single human being encounters ever so often in life.
It's only a drama if you make one out of it. Those who feel alienated have the task of eliminating/working through the feeling of alienation themselves. It is not the responsibility of others to create a sense of familiarity in the self.
If I go to Japan and I don't speak the language, I don't expect all Japanese people to speak German. I de-alienate myself by learning to speak their language. If I don't like Japanese, well, there are plenty of other people I can learn to like.
by others, yeah, is bollocks in bags. It means I give up any remaining autonomy and self-reliance. I expect to be carried, comforted, understood by everyone like a baby and to have all my needs met pronto.
That's the strange thing. It can be a lifelong dependency on pharmaceuticals. Who would voluntarily do that to themselves. If they do, then the need is really, really dire. And would reveal this whole sorry affair as a genuinely rare exception, which in reality it is. No norm. But ab-normality (which is just an ordinary term serving in contrast).