I think this is poor execution of a poll and is inherently biased. It might be good for finding out an interested party but there is a lack of visibility for an uninterested party. @phusionphil expressed distaste for the method and expressed his protest to this idea leprecon said that the downvote could be confused for a vote in favor which showcases not only the flaws in the system but his obvious bias and willingness to skew something that's been made clear so that it ends in his favor. It's difficult to even make sense of the poll and it's my belief that the proposal is done in this confusing manner to make it difficult to disagree. I am also completely against this initiative largely due to how deceptive this practice is. As soon as someone upvotes the pro side with many of the other comments being upvoted there is an obvious differential regarding the visibility of both options.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah and paying someone you disagree with is the dumbest idea I have ever heard, that's why I downvoted, he wants to milk the rewards pool for his poll.
If this behavior keeps up, without a good proof of concept, I'm just going to downvote 100% of leprechauns posts because he self votes