@proofofbrainio Are you really going to throw away 3000 PoB to someone whose supposed qualifications is a failed project that had to be shut down due to lack of interest? Someone who also identifies themself as s 'priest' of science as if that's some kind of boon. The only thing this poll can show is who is interested not an indicators of who is against the project. Most people who don't like the idea probably didn't even make it to the comments to know the proposal works like this. There are so many things wrong with the logic of the proposal. For example the point about how he needs to get more than his curation rewards. Curation is still based on the way voting power works so having less time to curate isn't going to have a 1 to 1 ratio in loss of profits. Curation has diminishing returns on time invested. A person who is curating for 4 hours a day like they propose they are should still be able to fully optimize their rewards
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: