Or, would the definition of good content in this community be a short text that talks about something personal, like an experience or that contains enough creativity to deserve to be valued? I believe it can be both.
Oh, I love your post. Upvoted, promoted, and reblogged. You have inspired me.
It certainly can be both. I am no writing judge. I try and review as much as I can, but I don't always have the time.
If it satisfies the basic requirements of no plagiarism, copy, hate and I'm engaged...I UV. If it doesn't meet the basics I will DV and explain with the opportunity to revote. I'm ready for that stage now.
Something that's helped me in the past to review writings was curation posts. Except I would love to do something differently, for marginal awards to the writers. We could read a couple of articles that we enjoy and then post a curation report. Some proceeds could be dedicated to the writers.
Thank you! It encourages me to keep writing.
This is a great idea! There are many good ideas on how to curate curatorship to the maximum number of people who deserve it. I hope we can soon put some of them into practice to bring about real changes in the community.
Nice. I'm glad you like it. It will be my first curation post. I've started reviewing now and I'll post hopefully this week. I may just focus on STEM-related articles first as that is my IRL job. However, I'll likely expand to business/finance because of a new analyst job I landed. We'll see. Training wheels first, I guess.