You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: POB - A high-powered ship, stuck in the port // POB - Um Navio de alta potência, amarrado no porto

I'm not exactly sure what you're looking for in this post. One problem with respect to growth is money and time. I'm not too sure that money is the problem, but time certainly is an issue. We're all participating in the community, but we also have our own lives. It takes time to grow a community and reliable use cases for development.

I recently started reading and participating with insight.pob's talk series. I think something like that is good for the community because it asks for the basics and is forward-thinking to a degree.

In my case, I've been trying to record the proposals given by the community with the hopes of writing a project plan for proposal to pob. We've got a new front-end in use and in development. The next thing on the list I see as important is recruitment and refinement. We need to get more people involved with pob and then refine our governance to be as stable across the platform as possible. We need refinement to avoid the unnecessary instability.

I'm interested in the conversation you had with onealfa. It seems like there's a conversation I missed and I'd like to get it included for future reference. Can you send an article link?


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Sort:  

Eighteen days late, friend, I'm sorry! I will improve! haha.
In fact, take it easy, time is really a major issue around here, and I can prove it with my own delay in responding to comments! But in a way this is still "my problem", due to lack of organization, and I hope to gradually discipline myself better in this regard. Of course, POB will continue to grow in popularity and projects, but it is still a "no man's land" in my view, where we could have more intelligent engagement (in terms of delegation, curatorship, etc.) from the greats. About this conversation I had with Onealfa, it wasn't in any text or topic, it was through Discord, where I just questioned him if he wasn't interested in taking on more responsibilities here, since he's a high-power profile, he could not only do a lot of the project develop, it would also have more profits, but it is not in his interest to get involved in something like creating a team or a group to take positions and take care of a parallel organization.
I was curious about your Insight.pobs comment, what is it about? Where I find?

In terms of @insight.pob most of his articles. I’m drawn to participate in them. A lot of people have questions there about the platform specifically.

If @onealfa doesn’t want to participate in the day to day honestly that’s his option as an investor regardless of his stake. He maintains a sort of regulatory position in my eyes. It’s what I’m used to in my career. He drops his opinion like anyone else when he feels the situation calls for it. I'm naturally drawn to his responses because he presents data to back it up.

Don’t worry about late responses. I would worry if no responses came at all. I appreciate the engagement.

My priority now is to continue with these POB talks, get a clear line on what POB is pursuing, and communicate his message as needed for the rest of the community.