Hello, dear guardian. Pleased to greet you and surprised by your recommendations peppered with accusation. I dedicated a little more than 16 hours in the elaboration of this post, as always, I took care of details such as my own images or those of my family group (who participated in the trip), writing the text with my own words and ideas, except for general knowledge information such as names of places, things and others. Of course, I edited the main image in Adobe Photoshop, version 26.0.0 and I forgot to mention it; however, I used and mentioned the translator. The whole text is a product of my own ideas, thoughts and experience; therefore, I still do not understand where I commit the abuse.
In this regard and in an interested manner, I ask you to please be a bit more specific and point me to the section, fragment or content element that I have incorporated in a misleading manner.
Thank you for your human qualities and willingness to clarify.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Había algunas dudas acerca de que la escritura fuera IA, así que decidí dejar la sugerencia para las guías.
I checked the links you left me and I was redirected to an update and extension of the regulation, puzzled by that suggestion, I submit my own content to review in several platforms of plagiarism and AI detector in content, resulting in 100% of the content is own, produced by human, not plagiarized or recycled. The only segment that I repeat at the end of my publications is the one that corresponds to the production of images, which remains the same because I keep my mobile equipment.
In truth, plagiarism is not an optional practice in my behavior for the production of content, I enjoy writing and if from time to time I take time away from the activity on the blog is because I have many professional commitments that limit my time.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)