Why Shouting Out Small YouTube Channels May Not Be Beneficial
In a thought-provoking video titled Why I Stopped Shouting Out Small YouTube Channels, influential content creator Austin McConnell explores why promoting smaller channels may actually do more harm than good. His insights provide a fresh perspective on the ever-evolving landscape of YouTube and its recommendation system.
The Changing YouTube Landscape
Austin reflects on the significant changes in YouTube's algorithm over time. Initially, a creator's subscriber count was seen as a clear indicator of their popularity, but now, the platform prioritizes engagement metrics such as watch time and user satisfaction. As a result, a channel's subscriber count carries less weight in terms of visibility and reach.
Despite Austin’s massive following of 1.4 million subscribers, he reveals that only a small percentage of his views originate from subscriber feeds. This observation raises an important question for aspiring creators: why focus so intently on subscriber numbers when that metric may not correlate with overall viewership?
The Importance of Engagement Over Subscribers
Austin's arguments lead to the realization that engagement is now the true currency on YouTube. While having a strong subscriber count may have advantages, such as meeting monetization requirements or attracting sponsors, the real goal should be to create high-quality content that resonates with viewers.
To achieve this, creators need to prioritize three key elements:
Produce Quality Content: The cornerstone of any successful channel, good content must engage the audience effectively.
Publish Regularly: Consistency allows the algorithm to test the content with various audience segments, increasing the chances of gaining organic viewership.
Allow for Algorithm Testing: Time is essential for the algorithm to analyze audience reactions and adjust recommendations accordingly.
Austin points out a surprising truth: not all traffic is beneficial. When creators shout out smaller channels, they may inadvertently attract viewers who don’t genuinely care about the content. This can lead to a surge in subscribers without any corresponding increase in engagement, which can harm a channel’s standing in the algorithm.
This phenomenon highlights the fact that support doesn't equate to genuine interest. Viewers subscribing out of support may not return for future content, which signals to the algorithm that the videos are not resonating, resulting in decreased visibility.
While it feels good to support smaller creators, the reality is that this form of engagement often leads to disappointment. Subscribers gained through shout-outs may not stick around for genuine engagement, underlining the importance of attracting an audience that is interested in the creator’s content, rather than in the act of supporting them.
Austin uses an example of a fictional Lego channel to illustrate this point: if a viewer subscribes only out of goodwill, they may never watch the videos again. This ultimately sends a negative signal to the algorithm, leading to poor performance in the long run.
Despite these challenges, Austin acknowledges that subscriber count still has merit, particularly when it comes to meeting monetization requirements and attracting sponsor interest. Many businesses still view subscriber numbers as a sign of credibility and reach.
However, Austin's advice to focus on real growth resonates deeply. Rather than obsessing over subscriber counts, creators should instead monitor their engagement metrics, such as baseline viewership, to get a clearer picture of their audience's loyalty and interest.
The discussion raises an important question for the community: how would our engagement with YouTube change if subscriber counts were completely removed from the platform? This thought experiment challenges the community to consider what truly matters in content creation: genuine interest and engagement.
--
While Austin wraps up his video with more insights, the key takeaway is clear: aspiring creators should prioritize producing quality content, cultivating genuine audience interest, and closely analyzing engagement metrics. By adopting this approach, creators can foster sustainable growth and better navigate the challenges of the YouTube landscape.
In essence, supporting creators is vital, but it must stem from authentic interest rather than mere obligation.
Part 1/7:
Why Shouting Out Small YouTube Channels May Not Be Beneficial
In a thought-provoking video titled Why I Stopped Shouting Out Small YouTube Channels, influential content creator Austin McConnell explores why promoting smaller channels may actually do more harm than good. His insights provide a fresh perspective on the ever-evolving landscape of YouTube and its recommendation system.
The Changing YouTube Landscape
Austin reflects on the significant changes in YouTube's algorithm over time. Initially, a creator's subscriber count was seen as a clear indicator of their popularity, but now, the platform prioritizes engagement metrics such as watch time and user satisfaction. As a result, a channel's subscriber count carries less weight in terms of visibility and reach.
Part 2/7:
Despite Austin’s massive following of 1.4 million subscribers, he reveals that only a small percentage of his views originate from subscriber feeds. This observation raises an important question for aspiring creators: why focus so intently on subscriber numbers when that metric may not correlate with overall viewership?
The Importance of Engagement Over Subscribers
Austin's arguments lead to the realization that engagement is now the true currency on YouTube. While having a strong subscriber count may have advantages, such as meeting monetization requirements or attracting sponsors, the real goal should be to create high-quality content that resonates with viewers.
To achieve this, creators need to prioritize three key elements:
Part 3/7:
Produce Quality Content: The cornerstone of any successful channel, good content must engage the audience effectively.
Publish Regularly: Consistency allows the algorithm to test the content with various audience segments, increasing the chances of gaining organic viewership.
Allow for Algorithm Testing: Time is essential for the algorithm to analyze audience reactions and adjust recommendations accordingly.
The Pitfalls of Shout-Outs
Part 4/7:
Austin points out a surprising truth: not all traffic is beneficial. When creators shout out smaller channels, they may inadvertently attract viewers who don’t genuinely care about the content. This can lead to a surge in subscribers without any corresponding increase in engagement, which can harm a channel’s standing in the algorithm.
This phenomenon highlights the fact that support doesn't equate to genuine interest. Viewers subscribing out of support may not return for future content, which signals to the algorithm that the videos are not resonating, resulting in decreased visibility.
Navigating the Challenges of Creator Support
Part 5/7:
While it feels good to support smaller creators, the reality is that this form of engagement often leads to disappointment. Subscribers gained through shout-outs may not stick around for genuine engagement, underlining the importance of attracting an audience that is interested in the creator’s content, rather than in the act of supporting them.
Austin uses an example of a fictional Lego channel to illustrate this point: if a viewer subscribes only out of goodwill, they may never watch the videos again. This ultimately sends a negative signal to the algorithm, leading to poor performance in the long run.
The Role of Subscriber Count
Part 6/7:
Despite these challenges, Austin acknowledges that subscriber count still has merit, particularly when it comes to meeting monetization requirements and attracting sponsor interest. Many businesses still view subscriber numbers as a sign of credibility and reach.
However, Austin's advice to focus on real growth resonates deeply. Rather than obsessing over subscriber counts, creators should instead monitor their engagement metrics, such as baseline viewership, to get a clearer picture of their audience's loyalty and interest.
Embracing New Perspectives
Part 7/7:
The discussion raises an important question for the community: how would our engagement with YouTube change if subscriber counts were completely removed from the platform? This thought experiment challenges the community to consider what truly matters in content creation: genuine interest and engagement.
--
While Austin wraps up his video with more insights, the key takeaway is clear: aspiring creators should prioritize producing quality content, cultivating genuine audience interest, and closely analyzing engagement metrics. By adopting this approach, creators can foster sustainable growth and better navigate the challenges of the YouTube landscape.
In essence, supporting creators is vital, but it must stem from authentic interest rather than mere obligation.