Yes, quality content is rewarded, and yes, with persistence, and a modicum of talent, one can stay ahead of the crowd.
The hive is in pretty good shape, but I think with a 1000mv vote limit it will be in even better shape.
Not a forced compliance thing like the whale experiment, but a voluntary putting down of power by those that have it.
Trending is not much up in quality, imo.
Plenty of plastic content still getting pushed to the top.
(Corporate speak and stock photos shouldn't trend, iyam.)
Even though curation rewards are linear, no advantage to piling on, anymore.
Instead of rewarding newbs for organic content latte art is getting hundreds, smdh.
I have to say that I agree with most of the stuff you said but that's just the way things are around here I guess.
The content isn't as good as it could be but compared to a few years ago and compared to other similar websites like Reddit, we are doing great.
Capped rewards sound like a good idea but I can see scenarios where it can be counterproductive.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I wouldn't be for capped rewards, either.
I'm for voluntary restraint from the largest accounts.
We already get some, I'd like to see more.
But, other than that, we are the best game in town, imo.