So, ah, before I can offer an opinion on whether I think Mass Formation Psychosis is real... can anyone explain what it actually is? Like, I understand it in context... but is there an agreed upon definition?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Lawls
Nah! Just make up your own definition like everyone else.
Can't I just get my definition of Mass Formation Psychosis from everyone else to prove I'm not suffering from Mass Formation Psychosis?
Is this not a good enough definition?
It was fine to provide context, but he kinda rambles on for a bit explaining it. I was looking for something clear and concise instead of something kinda vague... but if that doesn't exist that's fine. I just wanted to be able to explain it to other people.
I thought it was somewhat self-explanatory.
Mass Formation Psychosis is when a huge group is irrationally afraid of an imagined threat, and they will irrationally attack anyone around them that doesn't agree with that narrative (which is how the psychosis spreads; ironically like a virus).
Doesn't matter if the imagined threat is COVID or Jews or Witches or whatever else.
In every one of these cases there is an elite class that has a financial incentive to spread the psychosis.
In the worst case scenario of killing Jews and "Witches", all the property was transferred to the killers.
COVID vaccinations seem to be more tame and subsidized by taxpayers and insurance companies.
That second sentence is perfect, thank you.
So weird that everyone was saying it doesn't exist... everyone believes that 'mob mentality' is a thing, there are plenty of examples of that being real. This at least seems related, like, acting like a mob even though you're not physically surrounded by people being all pitchforky.
Yes it's very obvious that the people saying it doesn't exist have an agenda and they are manipulating the data. By saying things like "not an academic term recognized in the field of psychology". Like yes, technically that's true, but they are obviously still lying and manipulating the issue. It's clear that they do not have an objective opinion, therefore their opinion is largely worthless and should be ignored.