A little birdy told you 11% is higher than 0%?!? I can see why you've been doing so well with your day trading now.
Personally I'm against leaving the WHO. I think it's bad for the US and bad for the world. It really just means the US has way less access to data and everyone is less prepared for diseases that we're really good at sharing by airplane now.
yeah the WHO thing is kinda crazy but I for sure am not informed enough to have an opinion on it
I'm curious if you've read any of the discussion around the Pandemic Agreement the WHO's been driving. I've read that several clauses enabled the WHO to unilaterally determine what was a 'medical emergency' and could include such things as automobile safety, firearms safety, and climate, granting the WHO power to create regulations regarding these issues that supersede national policies.
It is political scheming in that vein that makes me allergic to transnational agencies, NGOs, and governments.
I think one of the important ones to keep a close eye on is this new polio vaccine. As a result, I am not so convinced they'd go back to the old ruse, which there was a lot of preparedness that went on. If I remember correctly, it was The Axis of Evil: Bush, Obama and Trump, Part 1 & 2, I did awhile back, that when you get to the Trump part details a lot of how they went on about accomplishing that preparedness. This time it may just be rolled out like the last time Gates attempted it and become a disaster. The fact that Gates and Trump discussed the urgency in rolling it out all across the globe at the same time to ensure it's success from being able to mutate, well, it's Bill Gates, and he was not only run out of that last country but sued and won after injuries and deaths. But now the claim is they've isolated the part of the virus that was responsible for the mutation so this next go around should succeed, and especially if it's a global rollout whereas people, I am assuming kids, but who knows, get it at the same time it will prevent it from mutating in the first place. If you read up on it, some scientist say this go around they can't afford to be wrong even with a slight risk factor something could go wrong. The goal is to wipe out polio from across the globe but how much of a risk factor is acceptable if any within countries who have eliminated polio as a concern and the old polio vaccines works just fine keeping it that way. That's where a curious twist also occurs in all this, as when the discussion came about in the media, of course people threw barbs at Kennedy making claims he was trying to get rid of the polio vaccine, but it wasn't him, it's Gates, but Kennedy played it as he never wanted to get rid of a trusted polio vaccine that's been around for decades, but that's not the vaccine they were talking about, it's the new polio vaccine. If I remember correctly, there's been something like around two million, maybe two fifty, kids who have gotten it in studies and it appears to work fine, but that's not a lot compared to the overall global population. So this is one where people might want to keep their eyes on as it develops as Trump assured Gates of trying to get it done within the next four years.