The recent scene involving an eagle in Númenor during the power struggle between Miriel and Ar-Pharazôn has stirred significant debate among fans of Tolkien's work. Isaac, a keen observer of these narratives, questions the logic and coherence of this portrayal, listing several aspects that contribute to the confusion surrounding the eagle's involvement.
First and foremost, it is essential to recognize that eagles had left Númenor a millennium prior to the events depicted in the scene. This long absence prompts critical questions: what was an eagle doing back in the palace during a political dispute? If the eagle was indeed present to support Miriel against Ar-Pharazôn, why did it make no attempt to clarify the misunderstanding that its arrival caused among the people?
The audience observed chaos as individuals shouted, “The eagle chooses Ar-Pharazôn.” The eagle, aware of this misinterpretation, simply turned away and departed. This reaction leaves many bewildered. If the eagle was meant to convey a message of support for Miriel, it completely failed to communicate that intention.
Isaac argues that the decline of Númenor can be traced back to a deep-seated aversion to death, initiated not with Ar-Pharazôn but long before during the reign of Tar-Atnir, a king who began to challenge the notion of mortality. Over time, this existential dread led to a significant divide between Númenor and the Undying Lands. The Valar's messengers, who were sent to advise the king, were largely ignored, setting in motion the chain of events that would see Númenor drift further away from what they deemed divine guidance.
The eagle is often seen as a divine messenger, relaying the intentions of the Valar. However, if the connection is severed due to Númenor’s own choices, the very idea of an eagle appearing in a contentious royal moment becomes paradoxical.
Moving forward, if we entertain the idea that the eagle did return to support Miriel, the implications of its silence become even more troubling. Would a messenger of the Valar truly allow its presence to be misinterpreted without intervening to clarify its intentions? Isaac emphasizes a critical point: in Tolkien’s works, eagles are not only messengers; they are rational beings capable of communication and clarity.
When eagles are portrayed in the narratives—such as in Gandalf's rescue at Isengard—they engage in dialogue, demonstrating their purpose and intelligence. The failure of the eagle in Númenor to communicate its stance is a stark departure from this established motif.
This leads to profound implications about how this scene is constructed and whether it aligns with Tolkien’s narrative traditions. Isaac poses the question of whether the show’s writers may be attempting to convey a deeper symbolic narrative through the eagle’s ambiguous presence. However, he contests that it dilutes the character of the eagles, who typically do not cause uncertainty.
Isaac suggests that the eagle should not have appeared at all if its intention was to remain neutral or ambiguous. This would not only preserve the gravity of the situation but also avoid potential misinterpretation regarding divine support during such a critical moment for Númenor.
In conclusion, Isaac invites viewers to share their perspectives on the matter. If anyone can provide clarity on why this eagle would remain silent or fail to navigate the misinterpretations surrounding its intention, he encourages them to contribute their thoughts in the comments section. The absence of understanding, even from intelligent analysis, resonates with a larger community yearning for coherence in adaptations of treasured texts.
As the conversation evolves, Isaac thanks new channel members for their support, inviting continued engagement with the content. The perplexities inherent in this narrative moment reflect broader challenges in adapting complex literary works into visual formats, fueling discussions among dedicated fans and new viewers alike.
Part 1/6:
The Confounding Presence of the Eagle in Númenor
The recent scene involving an eagle in Númenor during the power struggle between Miriel and Ar-Pharazôn has stirred significant debate among fans of Tolkien's work. Isaac, a keen observer of these narratives, questions the logic and coherence of this portrayal, listing several aspects that contribute to the confusion surrounding the eagle's involvement.
The Timeline of Eagles and Númenor
Part 2/6:
First and foremost, it is essential to recognize that eagles had left Númenor a millennium prior to the events depicted in the scene. This long absence prompts critical questions: what was an eagle doing back in the palace during a political dispute? If the eagle was indeed present to support Miriel against Ar-Pharazôn, why did it make no attempt to clarify the misunderstanding that its arrival caused among the people?
The audience observed chaos as individuals shouted, “The eagle chooses Ar-Pharazôn.” The eagle, aware of this misinterpretation, simply turned away and departed. This reaction leaves many bewildered. If the eagle was meant to convey a message of support for Miriel, it completely failed to communicate that intention.
A Legacy of Mortality in Númenor
Part 3/6:
Isaac argues that the decline of Númenor can be traced back to a deep-seated aversion to death, initiated not with Ar-Pharazôn but long before during the reign of Tar-Atnir, a king who began to challenge the notion of mortality. Over time, this existential dread led to a significant divide between Númenor and the Undying Lands. The Valar's messengers, who were sent to advise the king, were largely ignored, setting in motion the chain of events that would see Númenor drift further away from what they deemed divine guidance.
The eagle is often seen as a divine messenger, relaying the intentions of the Valar. However, if the connection is severed due to Númenor’s own choices, the very idea of an eagle appearing in a contentious royal moment becomes paradoxical.
Part 4/6:
Interpreting the Eagle's Silence
Moving forward, if we entertain the idea that the eagle did return to support Miriel, the implications of its silence become even more troubling. Would a messenger of the Valar truly allow its presence to be misinterpreted without intervening to clarify its intentions? Isaac emphasizes a critical point: in Tolkien’s works, eagles are not only messengers; they are rational beings capable of communication and clarity.
When eagles are portrayed in the narratives—such as in Gandalf's rescue at Isengard—they engage in dialogue, demonstrating their purpose and intelligence. The failure of the eagle in Númenor to communicate its stance is a stark departure from this established motif.
A Question of Interpretation
Part 5/6:
This leads to profound implications about how this scene is constructed and whether it aligns with Tolkien’s narrative traditions. Isaac poses the question of whether the show’s writers may be attempting to convey a deeper symbolic narrative through the eagle’s ambiguous presence. However, he contests that it dilutes the character of the eagles, who typically do not cause uncertainty.
Isaac suggests that the eagle should not have appeared at all if its intention was to remain neutral or ambiguous. This would not only preserve the gravity of the situation but also avoid potential misinterpretation regarding divine support during such a critical moment for Númenor.
Conclusion: Ongoing Community Discussion
Part 6/6:
In conclusion, Isaac invites viewers to share their perspectives on the matter. If anyone can provide clarity on why this eagle would remain silent or fail to navigate the misinterpretations surrounding its intention, he encourages them to contribute their thoughts in the comments section. The absence of understanding, even from intelligent analysis, resonates with a larger community yearning for coherence in adaptations of treasured texts.
As the conversation evolves, Isaac thanks new channel members for their support, inviting continued engagement with the content. The perplexities inherent in this narrative moment reflect broader challenges in adapting complex literary works into visual formats, fueling discussions among dedicated fans and new viewers alike.