I agree. But first the INLEO site must offer near-100% reliability on posting content. Today, I once again tried to get a long form post out, but after multiple tries had to go back to PeakD.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree. But first the INLEO site must offer near-100% reliability on posting content. Today, I once again tried to get a long form post out, but after multiple tries had to go back to PeakD.
In no way should $LEO be printed and used to pay for content that someone else (the owner of peakd) can monetise.
Literally pissing our investment away.
I can appreciate your perspective, but I would be concerned that not having near-100% functionality is pissing your USERS away. Six vs. half-dozen, yadda, yadda...
Anyone that leaves because they can't earn $LEO from posting content onto another domain is a dead weight leech...
They are literally why every single layer-2 social token on Hive has already gone to zero.
If we want $LEO to be sustainable, then it needs to be all about incentivising content that earns revenue on inleo.io.
Revenue that is then used to buy/distribute LEO to creators/holders.
Again, agreed. But not what I said/suggested, exactly. You risk losing users when a site's functionality is patchy. The many error messages are tedious. I still stake all my $LEO, though. And I sit through 3-4-6 errors before giving up.