You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LeoThread 2023-12-26 17:12

in LeoFinance11 months ago

The day where INLEO stops paying authors in $LEO tokens for posting from PeakD, can't come soon enough.

Sort:  

Preach!!!

People that want to milk their full trail of $HIVE autovoters if they can't post on inleo.io for a day, should still be able to.

But they should not be paid $LEO to do so.

people will stop when inleo is fixed so when you try to post long form some of us get error messages and have to post from peakd also I cannot up vote a thread on inleo I have to use peakd

It sucks that is happening to you, but in no way should you earn $LEO tokens for your content that doesn't contribute to revenue.

It just shouldn't happen.

I don't even understand why this is even questioned.

well they need to fix the problem I am not the only one getting the error messages once they get that fixed will cure the problem it is a real pain to have to use both

It does not matter if inleo gives you an error message first or not.

If you want to add valuable content to peakd.com, then they can pay you their own token.

It should never be inleo's responsibility to pay you $LEO tokens to provide value to someone else's business.

Again... how is this even a question?

best answer is leo fixes it so it does not give error messages problem solved

Of course it would be better if the site worked 100% of the time...

But what problem is solved if it does work 100% of the time, but the team still prints $LEO tokens to pay people who provide content for peakd.com?

agreed.

Nobody cares about the sustainability of the token because they just want to earn everything and dump.

For $LEO, or any layer-2 social token to be sustainable, you can't just give it away for free.

You need to give it away in exchange for content that you are monetising and driving value back.

I agree. But first the INLEO site must offer near-100% reliability on posting content. Today, I once again tried to get a long form post out, but after multiple tries had to go back to PeakD.

In no way should $LEO be printed and used to pay for content that someone else (the owner of peakd) can monetise.

Literally pissing our investment away.

I can appreciate your perspective, but I would be concerned that not having near-100% functionality is pissing your USERS away. Six vs. half-dozen, yadda, yadda...

Anyone that leaves because they can't earn $LEO from posting content onto another domain is a dead weight leech...

They are literally why every single layer-2 social token on Hive has already gone to zero.

If we want $LEO to be sustainable, then it needs to be all about incentivising content that earns revenue on inleo.io.

Revenue that is then used to buy/distribute LEO to creators/holders.

Again, agreed. But not what I said/suggested, exactly. You risk losing users when a site's functionality is patchy. The many error messages are tedious. I still stake all my $LEO, though. And I sit through 3-4-6 errors before giving up.

Didn't know that was on a roadmap. Would that help the price much though?

The ad counter only goes up if people see the content on inleo, the more content we have the better, wouldn't that just close a possible way for people to post? 🤔

99% of traffic on evergreen content comes via Google.

if you post via another domain, then Google will always index that version, meaning inleo earns $0 of ad revenue on that content forever.

Ohhh! Did not know that piece of information, than yeah, it makes perfect sense to disable it...