You've got a lot of point here looking at how it has played out three times already.
Nevertheless, I am kind og creepy about this ETFguy; are they real pumpers or milkers?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You've got a lot of point here looking at how it has played out three times already.
Nevertheless, I am kind og creepy about this ETFguy; are they real pumpers or milkers?
Larry Fink and Blackrock?
They are selling a product.
They make more money if number goes up.
So far there is nothing nefarious going on (yet).
Numbers will have to go up with followed liquidation for them to stay in business, don't you think so?. Is this not a threat already. When big institutions like this cause outflows it will definitely show. I feel small investors will face big time loss.
Who's being liquidated in this scenario?
How can outflows result in a loss when we all bought before the funds even existed?
You're going to have to be a little more specific.
The business model of the ETF revolves around charging a yearly fee.
This is called the "expense ratio".
Currently this fee is about a quarter of a percent.
ETF providers have every reason to make number go up so they earn more money every year.
This is reassuring point that they have no reason to suppress the price, they benefit more then their customers who have skin in the game.
It's amazing how these people who build structures to allow other people take risks make money, rain or shine.
I have seen your presented facts friend. I will be making some findings for more clarity.
Hoping we don't see leveraged positions