RE: ALL HAIL PRESIDENT SKROOB!

[edicted]

You are very clearly making an accusation simply by assuming there should be the same number of votes.
Why are you operating under this assumption?
The answer is obvious; there's only one reason to make this assumption.
And it's the same reason that's flying all over the Internet right now.
You really think you can act like this is an innocent question, eh?
Interesting.

Comments

[peaceandmoney]

Once again you misunderstand. And you are right I am indeed operating under the assumption that there should be the same amount of votes in total in circulation because the voter turnout is virtually the same as in 2020, so there should indeed the same amount of votes.

[edicted]

If your question is:

why is the turnout 66% when the turnout isn't 66%?

Then the answer is the turnout wasn't 66%.
Right?

Just wait for the situation to unfold.
That's the real answer.

[peaceandmoney]

No, that is not my question. What figure do you have for the voter turnout in this election?

[edicted]

First of all: how do you think voter turnout is calculated?
Second of all: do you believe the denominator in this equation (the number of registered voters) stays the same every four years?

You seem to be operating under this assumption that the total amount of votes is calculated in a different way other than adding up all the votes. How does that work? Show me where you got this number. You're just saying things with zero links to any actual data.

I don't know and I don't care.
Elections are not secure and I've never voted in one.

[peaceandmoney]

Registered voters, based on the expansion of the US population, surely could have only increased if anything.

The data I am using is from the official vote counts posted on a number of media and alternative media websites, unless you have something more accurate?

[edicted]

Got it so your source is "trust me bro" and you refuse to link anything.
You also refuse to wait for all the votes to be counted.
You've also decided there are more registered voters because... reasons.
You seem to think you're onto something that other people aren't going to figure out.
Like if there's a mathematical certainty of fuckery then what are you worried about?
No one is going to "crack the case" with a single data point.
Again, this is a waste of time.
Wait.

https://election.lab.ufl.edu/2024-general-election-turnout/

These estimates are of 1:30pm on Friday, November 8 and will continue to be revised as more data become available. Understand that most vote-by-mail states are still receiving ballots postmarked by Election Day. In addition to these states, some states are still counting mail and provisional ballots. Initial uncertainty of turnout is typical for every election.

Initial uncertainty of turnout is typical for every election.

Initial uncertainty of turnout is typical for every election.

Initial uncertainty of turnout is typical for every election.

It does not work the way you think it works.

How does it work?
I have no idea, and neither do you.

[peaceandmoney]

Again, where are you getting your stats from? And as I have already said let's see what votes turn up.