Without entering a wrong versus right debate, differentiated APRs based on the size of the account could make sense in a system with one-account-one-person. Or at least where account associations are known or verifiable.
I go with this point and I'll also add that proof of stake can also influence the APRs when people don't maintain one account per individual.
A person with proof of stake has a competitive advantage in terms of making decisions in matters concerning the APR variations.
Thanks for this unique point.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I wasn't pleading that such a system would be good for Hive. In fact I don't like KYC and I try to avoid it as much as possible.
Yes, votes are stake-weighted, both for governance and for rewards, and I believe it's good that they are so. But unlike simple POS, DPOS is more flexible in my opinion.
I talked in the past about one-account, one-vote model. You might want to see what I had to say about it.
I'll visit your post as soon as possible to get adequate information on the subject matter.
Thanks
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta