The argument that $LEO isn’t Hive branded so therefore bad for Hive is embarrassing.
It is literally the dumbest, most misguided, self serving point a $HIVE stakeholder could argue.
Here's why 👇
1/12
The argument that $LEO isn’t Hive branded so therefore bad for Hive is embarrassing.
It is literally the dumbest, most misguided, self serving point a $HIVE stakeholder could argue.
Here's why 👇
1/12
I have felt that OG Hive users (with huge stakes) do not like #Leofinance very much for this reason. But Hive has not been innovating and so agile as $LEO. This is why we need Hive as the censorship resistant layer and projects to innovate!
$LEO isn’t Hive branded so therefore bad for Hive?
The dumbest, most misguided, self serving point a $HIVE stakeholder wanting what's best for ALL STAKEHOLDERS, could argue.
12/12
Well spoken. I think there are some other underlying factor that is actually we're the problem lies.
Luckily we are a strong community around Leo that will support them and I want to see them keep building and delivering result!
What underlying factors would you be referring to? 😉
Sounds like a lost Hive maximalist. Since all "layer two's" need HIVE to function on the Hive blockchain.. ..great points!
Even you PEPE.
Evennnnn youuuuu.
Haha… This $PEPE pump hurts the most… 😂
Hive is NOT a fucking brand.
Hive will never be a brand
Not only that, but we don’t ever want Hive to be a brand!
2/12
We want Hive to be the neutral, censorship-resistant base layer that ANYONE can build on top of.
That is literally the entire value proposal of what we have here.
3/12
It doesn’t matter which government or police force knocks on whose door.
Or who decides to buy whose stake to sybil attack the network.
Hive’s defence is PROVEN.
4/12
No, Hive is NOT a publisher or content business.
How the fuck can ownerless, neutral network generate revenue from content?
Exactly, it can’t.
5/12
But you know who can and does?
ACTUAL FUCKING BRANDS OWNED AND OPERATED LIKE COMPANIES.
6/12
Brands that can choose to establish themselves on Hive’s layer-2 to take advantage of the censorship-resistant blockchain and immutable account system.
7/12
The relationship between Hive and layer-2 brands is fucking symbiotic.
One can’t live without the other.
Both keep each other alive.
8/12
As stakeholders, we should be encouraging layer-2 dApps who choose to build on the Hive base layer, to brand THEIR way.
If they don’t want to mention Hive because they think that’s how to seamlessly onboard, THEN FUCKING GOOD.
9/12
Layer-2 branding is bad for Hive?
LITERALLY EVERY FUCKING USER WHO SIGNS UP FOR AND USES A LAYER-2 DAPP ENDS UP WITH A HIVE ACCOUNT.
10/12
A HIVE ACCOUNT THAT REQUIRES HIVE STAKE TO PUBLISH TO THE CENSORSHIP-RESISTANT BLOCKCHAIN.
11/12
I wish he could read this but I think his ego is so inflated he only hears his own voice.
Naa, then I'd just get downvoted.
I need to stop.
He won't be coming to threads anyway😅
I feel you on this because of this reason. Splinterlands had much of the same flack from these big people. But if it were not for Splinterlands I honestly don't think Hives price in the bull market would have even touched $1 🧵 1/2