Wouldn't regulatory issues in certain countries make this partnership a risky move?
For example, why would a US tourism operator want to do business on Travala when they will face scrutiny from the government? They're just regular already struggling businesses who don't need an extra layer of risk.
Isn't this going to be an issue?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
They can always pay with AVA, right? XMR is an extra option...unless AVA is banned there too
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
But I just mean the tourism industry is highly regulated. So any tourism operator working under strict government regulations could choose not to do business with Travala in case this messed with their regulatory requirements.
XMR could become a bit of a poison chalice for mainstream businesses and I'm interested to see some further opinion on whether this is actually a good thing or for Travala who definitely fall into this category.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Is it? Or is it just in US? I am pretty sure that they know what XMR stands for, yet they hose them as partners. If they thought that it would hurt their business they wouldn't have taken the deal, right?
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
The XMR narrative is definitely something to watch here.
I'm just a little nervous ;)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta