You didn't attack blurt and make this post to celebrate it?
Feels like this is exactly the right tree.
Once Again:
- You're responsible for the attack on block space that typically manifest as 32 set witness properties transactions per block beginning on Dec 23 like this post says, right?
- If you were, good job. It was pretty well executed.
- executing a bad thing well isn't good....
- You know that on Gitlab there are these things called issues, and that they can be opened and addressed, right?
- Process:
- You find a problem
- Feel free to try it out right on mainnet, it's a problem, after all!
- You report the problem and provide txid's to be helpful.
- Result: Gratitude
- Process:
- If you were, good job. It was pretty well executed.
- Do you claim responsibility for the attack on wblurt?
- Do you claim responsibility for the death threats received during this time?
- Were you using @privex blurt in a box node(s)?
- Was @deathwing involved?
- You simply wanted to destabilize the chain, and cause temporal and financial harm, correct?
PS:
I believe @holger80 is correct, and this means I failed in code review an accept full responsibility for that.
PPS:
DBAA
If you DBAA, you will live a happier and more fulfilled life.
Example: You won't be suspected of stealing and making death threats.