Yes, Prime Minister - Power to the People featuring a similar idea is a great episode.
However, the proposition does not click with me. I do not care for a better reputation system. Reputation is not a number. Maybe a large vector but surely not a sortable scalar. My only proposition in this area is to avoid (mis)using it.
I also prefer stake-based approach to counting heads (accounts). I do not see a way to incorporate that in your proposed system.
Plus, you spammed every response in the thread you linked which suggests we might not be compatible (despite me liking the customised intro of the comment I am replying to).
I appreciate your response even though I pass up on that one.
i take on board your comment re spamming the comments and will avoid that in future. Thanka.
Re. counting heads, the reputation system will take care of that in time. It will be very difficult for alt accounts ti join the same meeting at the same time, so rep score would decrease, or at least not be increased if not attending meetings.
Also, the Trusted Reputation score is just part if the system, and the reputation score would mostly i think be based on feedback from questionnaires from direct peers following (or even during) the anonymous 8PAC meetings of eight people.
Thank you for respinding.
Sat Nam