proxy their governance votes?Should we add another tier for delegators to @leo.voter who
This would give $LEO much greater influence over #hive governance and allow us to further the growth of our community (my opinion)
proxy their governance votes?Should we add another tier for delegators to @leo.voter who
This would give $LEO much greater influence over #hive governance and allow us to further the growth of our community (my opinion)
No. It will only incentivize further centralization of the voting.
That isnt what we want.
I would go for another tier of Leo.voter delegation based upon other ideas or metrics.
I disagree. There is so much dormant governance power
The centralized part is outside of Leo and on Hive
Look at the funded proposals and top 20 witnesses
Leo is no longer funded by the DHF. We are #27 on the witness list
Having this influence will grow our position on this blockchain. We have 1/3 of all hive creators as Inleo users. We are the largest project next to splinterlands
Yet we are treated like the ugly stepchild on hive. Other projects get funded because they get one critical vote that is worth 24M hive power
The centralization is not with us. It’s outside of us.
Big yes. We need Leo in top 20
That sounds like a great idea, Khal.
I am looking forward to the details.
I think it is important to maintain the Hive unity within the individual communities. No community should stand alone.
yeah I am with Task on this more centralization feels bad,
but I get your point.
I can't stand easily 6 of the top 20 for governanace and the DHF is joke. My project would never get funding.
Plus let's not talk about all the funds that the "marketing fund" has given out to projects like WOO because they are friends.
so much corruption in the DHF. 600 HBD a day for Keychain????
are you frking serious!!!
I am all for what it takes to change it.
So if you feel this is a good idea to change things.
I will not rail against it.
I think this is an important idea and you can also see my reply to task on that too
The centralization is external to Leo. We aren’t funded anymore. We aren’t a top 20 witness.
Why? Because 1 person namely has all the control. If this person didn’t vote, there would only be about 2-3 DHF proposals funded right now.
There is a massive lack of accountability and for us to change things, we need more weight to swing around
I agree with this 100 percent.
I constantly think about how we can shake things up.
Yeah moving weight around is the best idea.
I didn't know the funding was cut. SMH.
I support this.
Our proposal is literally a 0 risk to the Hive ecosystem way to grow the ecosystem
How is that possible?
The proposal outlines clearly that if we don't achieve 10,000 MAUs by the end of the proposal, then we will refund 100% of the DHF money back (from my own pocket).
So either we get 10,000 MAUs for Hive or it cots Hive $0. I really hate the way we're getting treated as a community and project on this chain.
this is a good time to remind Lions which are the best options to witness vote or proxy.
Is there a post coming that lists and explains who InLeo votes for and why?
there have already been tons of posts about this, you could look through them
TLDR;
No dude, about InLeo's support for witnesses in the governance and search hasn't been working too well. Is there something about me that rubs you the wrong way? This is twice now you've blown me off...
I’m not sure how I could simultaneously be responding to you and blowing you off
I misunderstood your question about voting.
Yes, we’ll put out a lengthy post and search is being worked on.
Ive been here like 10 days and dont know where to look for anything,but you tell me the info is already out there, but no help or urls or even simply basic patience. I feel you're being short with me,rather than helpful
That is a tricky question. I say NO, but the post about this question would be nice. Maybe i will change my vote then.