QUESTION
I would like to hear from you what you think of the role assigned to HW? Do they fulfill the function for which DHF pays them? Is it necessary to have 1 or more "groups" to do this control as Hive grows?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I haven't had any personal interaction with them. I know it's a hot topic. I think on the surface, it's a project that was always designed to keep the blockchain clean. I hope that will always be the focus.
Someone really needs to do the work to keep Hive clean and prevent abuse. Thanks for giving your point of view!
i think thats what the original mission was for all these type of projects. hope it gets back to what it's intended to be, and not personal opinion about what deserves rewards and what doesnt.
I've interacted with them primarily on behalf of other members. Essential project, but the implementation has been questionable from my personal POV. I think there may be better options for how it can be run, but it's going to require the involvement of more individuals.
I think I'd actually like to see either a larger amount of people running this type of project (for the purpose of decentralization / consensus) or possibly have someone assigned to each community so that each community could decide how to use this type of project. Easier said than done, of course. I think there's an essential role for them on the chain - if implemented properly.