This works pretty great,
I have a question for the general Voting topic already. Would most problems surrounding that been solved with
- A down vote cap of 49,9% of the posts rewards
- 'disagreed' rewards flowing back to the rewardpool
- Upvotemana would stay spend
Been wondering about that for a while, don't see the flaw in it.
people are just complaining about downvotes AGAIN! because they have spent no time building a community and dont get a bunch of upvotes. they are here not to build but milk for rewards. Ignore them things are fine
I don't see an active downvote war in front of me right now. But it certainly is a topic that has caused 'forks' in the community. I'd like to solve all the tension grammatically without compromising on vital utility and I think it's possible.
I think the current conversations about reward pools / downvoting is just people complaining because other tokens are going up and Hive is going sideways. TBH if Hive was above $1 no one would be wasting time on this topic
Well, there are a lot of factors contributing to the Layer1 of the Hive Blockchain and it's layer0 communities and Code Base. The code surrounding the voting mechanics are certainly not a reason for stability. In the coming months, we'll see Layer2 starting get in action and making waves. It's time to settle on a path that disables off-boarding via downvotes, still protects the reward pool and all of that mechanically. R0d0n is right with his analysis that AI will bring a big shift towards un-manageability, but that's just the next reason to settle on a code solution that makes the voting mechanics anti-fragile.
I disagree.
What R0d0n is proposing will cause another Layer 0 chain split.
And to be honest if Hive went above a $1 and stayed there this would not even be a conversation.
We can agree to disagree.
Hmm. Certainly different opinions can exist without causing any problems to each other.