Advanced AI would seek to be efficient. Sights and sounds; sensations. AI would skip all the necessary steps and go straight to triggering the sensations.
(That thought was raw and needs a little more fine tuning...)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
yea, you may be right here. though what about adding randomness to certain paths and decisions AI will take to get to some result?
Randomness would require a selection of sorts, from something in existence. And chaos wouldn't be manageable nor programable. Both make noise.
but isn't the state of AGI not about the programmability of such? isn't AGI beyond reinforcement learning? ie by learning based on input and response? but by 'thinking' on its own? question is: can we reach true AGI? I tend to think it will
Often when trying to explain the creative process, we struggle, because the finished product and all ideas involved, were not thought of (like we do when we communicate). Explained like: The mind is giving. Unsure of source. Just happens.
agree... I tend to go by my gut feeling, even with business decisions. I like to believe my unconsciousness is thinking like my conscious but better and feeds the gut feeling. Whenever I need to convince others ...
... I explain my gut feeling with logical arguments coming from my conscious thought processes. Irrespective of my gut feeling, reality shows am mostly successfully convincing others (especially in business, colleagues, customers) 😆
Can't be explained effectively, nor taught. Impossible to learn? Probably. Good luck, AI.
Super tired on this end. Gotta run. Ciao!