What is the incentive to claim the hitman-theory is baseless conspiracy?
Hm. To throw us off the scent if it is not baseless? I have no idea what happened or why, but that guy seemed far too calm the entire time to have not been some kind of pro. Perhaps he was under mind control? At this point in our currently very surreal world, no explanation seems preposterous to me. I'll wait and see, but will not believe a word of the official explanation, especially if it is very simple.
But that isn't the official explanation: it's just more armchair experts trying to get attention.
And yet you've taken it and are now using this as supporting counter-evidence.
I asked what incentive they have to throw of off the scent and your reply was to throw us off the scent.
This is problematic, yes?
There's a reason I waited a couple days to even have this discussion.
The information available is lacking and conjecture is very high.
I'll probably have to circle back in the coming weeks.
But on a very real level it does not matter if the act was revolutionary or not.
Perception is reality.
I don't see where you asked this.
Honestly, I hadn't even been following this story until I read your post. So I'm in wait and see what BS the official story is.