I understand the decentralization. What I see on Hive, in practice, is not that. The DAO itself is not decentralized, with it's less than 20% proposal approval rate. How I see, this is the reason why so many front-ends exist, it can feed the few, basically by doing nothing progressive.
I see, here the few use the 'decentralized' word the same how our 'leaders' use the 'democratic' word. Pretty much everybody with a bit common sense see, the democracy doesn't exist at all, but a good curtain to cover reality.
So, since it's not decentralized in practice, the few are in the charge (not elected 'leaders', not even those elected, who do marketing - nor have any relevant knowledge -, they just simply make the decisions by money, and they setup the approval rate at so low, that each group of interests could get what they want). If they can adapt these kind of governance from real world, they could even adapt more.
Currently, in practice, I see it as a totalitarian corporate communist-fascist system here, very far from decentralization.
A system like this never will attract investors, developers, other projects, when it does, these guys will scream for another fork, how they did it in the past.
This 'system' is pretty much equal with our current real world one, ain't no different, no matter what fancy words, ideas they push to cover reality.