My vote isn't worth all that much, so I really don't have much use for upvoting myself (I think I did it by accident once or twice). I can see the temptation, but feel like people can generate almost as much value upvoting other people
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
You are right. 50:50 vote distribution is powerful.
But some think the simple way: why should I give $100 to others, while I can take all $200 instead of $100.
This is what comes back to me from my daily LEO curations.
Note that the same amount is distributed every day/month to others.
Maybe I should take $18000 instead of just $9000 ???
Why? Because I can. 😃
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Well you also have to consider the type of community you would create if that were the case. If everyone were to upvote themselves all the time and if you were to make that $18000 it would be short lived; the token would simply lose value because there would be no utility to others, the main aspect of a social network structure such as Hive. It would be a seemingly infinite ATM, until the lack of utility is recognized and the token dips forever towards zero. Community is everything here, without it there is no value.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
@onealfa.leo i wish everyone would do things the right way which you do,instead of self-voting,i observe that you do upvote others and make the community a better place....keep up the good work sir...
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta